National Gun Forum banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Ancient Gaseous Emanation
Joined
·
53,936 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
James G. Robertson
January 12, 2020


YouTube is now blocking links to the State of Virginia Legislative Information System (LIS). On Saturday, the YouTube channel Guns & Gadgets posted a video titled “Virginia Anti-Gun Bills To Be Heard Jan 13,” wherein the proprietor discussed the 10 bills that will come before the Virginia legislature beginning January 13. In the video’s description, he listed LIS links to the text for each bill. As of 1 a.m. Sunday morning, YouTube was blocking the links with the following warning:



Does the State of Virginia know that YouTube suspects their site of “malware, phishing attempts, or disturbing content?” The anti-gun bills are certainly disturbing, but probably not in the way that YouTube intended to convey.

What we are witnessing is an attack by the media on the citizens of Virginia. Media oligarchs don’t want you to see the laws that politicians are about to pass. We can ask, “Why bother having sunshine laws, when the oligarchy will attempt to block the sunshine?” Remember, the virulent left has a strategy. As Nancy Pelosi said, “...we have to pass the bill so that you can, ah, find out what is in it…”

On Friday, the Virginia legislature voted to ban firearms in the Capitol building and in the legislative offices of the Pocahontas building. In a case of guns for us but not for thee, Sen. Amanda Chase (R-11th) has worn a gun on the Senate floor, but suddenly the majority of Democrat lawmakers are worried about their safety if law abiding Virginia citizens are allowed into the building with holstered firearms, as they have been allowed in the past.

The gun ban was designed and passed as a preemptive strike on lawful citizens to disarm them before Lobby Day on Jan. 20, when at least 100 bus loads of citizens will arrive at the Capitol to confront Democrat lawmakers over their anti-gun agenda. The gun ban is a perfect expression of why we have the second amendment.

Lawmakers seek their own safety at the expense of the citizenry, and genuinely believe that law abiding citizens are the unsafe elements of society. The Second Amendment exists to secure our own rights and our own safety against the very tyrants who believe we are the unsafe ones. Listen to House Speaker Eileen Filler-Corn (D-41st) :

Our focus here is to keep everybody safe, said Filler-Corn. These are policies and rules that should have passed a long, long time ago and we’re excited and pleased that we’re moving forward now with the goal of keeping everybody safe.​

Have you ever noticed how liberal regressive politicians who are openly suborning the Constitution and going backwards in history are always “excited and pleased” and are “moving forward” and “keeping everybody safe?” The vulgarity of their verbiage is insufferable.

The Democrats’ hypocrisy is on full display in SB 70, a bill to require universal background checks on all firearm transfers. On Lobby Day, all of the thousands of firearm owners who may show up carrying firearms will already have passed a background check, and many will have gone through the legal process to get a concealed carry permit.

And yet, despite all background checks and legalities, the liberal regressive Democrats have banned these gun owners from entering the Capitol building with guns. Why are they banned? They are banned because safety checked gun owners make Democrats feel unsafe.

We have to ask, if the Democrats fear for their safety in the presence of verified safe gun owners, why do they believe that even more of the same background checks are going to make anyone else safe?
On Lobby Day, the Capitol grounds will probably be the safest place in Virginia. On Lobby Day, the Capitol building likely will be protected by thousands of law-abiding gun owners legally carrying firearms for their own protection and the protection of the crowd. Meanwhile, inside the Capitol building, Democrat lawmakers will be huddling in fear behind Capitol police while they confront disarmed, safety checked gun owners -- because, well, those patriots just scare them.

What we are seeing is the same preemptive, flip-the-script, political tactics that laid the path for the Antifa riot in Charlottesville. A week before the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, former Gov. Terry McAuliffe warned people to stay away from Charlottesville, and former University of Virginia President Theresa Sullivan warned people to avoid the rally. In both of their public statements they sought to delegitimize their political opponents as unsafe, when in reality they were the unsafe political voices.

In reality, it was the police, the public safety officer of the State of Virginia, and the Governor himself who let a riot happen, and who then blamed it on their opponents. The investigative report by former U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy laid blame for the violence on Police Chief Al Thomas, who denied it. The same game is playing out right now, with lawmakers delegitimizing their political opponents, and media oligarchs preparing cover for whatever happens next.

If you want to read them, here are the bills that YouTube is suppressing:

SB 12 Universal Background Check

SB 22 One Hand Gun a Month

SB 35 Bans Guns At Parades, Marches, etc.

SB 69 One Handgun a Month (another one)

SB 70 Universal Background Checks (another one)

SB 240 Red Flag Bill

SB 450 Bans Guns At Board of Supervisors/City Council Meetings

SB 505 Bans Guns in Government Buildings

SB 543 Closes the Made Up “Gun Show Loophole”

SB 615 Bans Guns in Local Government Buildings/Public Parks




https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/youtube_blocks_links_to_texts_of_virginia_antigun_bills.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDR_Glock

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,214 Posts
VA already had a one handgun a month rule unless they did away with it and are trying to bring it back. I only know this because my dad shipped a couple of handguns to my brother in VA just before he passed away and he picked one up and had to wait 30 days to get the other. I always thought it was a strange law, do criminals often use more than one handgun when committing crimes and do they buy them at dealers?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
142 Posts
VA already had a one handgun a month rule unless they did away with it and are not trying to bring it back. I only know this because my dad shipped a couple of handguns to my brother in VA just before he passed away and he picked one up and had to wait 30 days to get the other. I always thought it was a strange law, do criminals often use more than one handgun when committing crimes and do they buy them at dealers?
+1
 

·
Ancient Gaseous Emanation
Joined
·
53,936 Posts
Discussion Starter #4

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
5,921 Posts
The one gun a month law was put in place because bad buyers were buying multiple guns and selling them on the streets of other cities. The only thing is how do you buy a handgun legally and sell it illegally, without it coming back on you? That makes it a BS law that once again is aimed at law abiding citizens.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,214 Posts
The one gun a month law was put in place because bad buyers were buying multiple guns and selling them on the streets of other cities. The only thing is how do you buy a handgun legally and sell it illegally, without it coming back on you? That makes it a BS law that once again is aimed at law abiding citizens.

Which is why i don't understand why straw purchasers are rarely if ever prosecuted. If one gun used in a crime comes back to a legal sale i can get that it may have been sold privately(sometimes numerous times) and ended up in the wrong hands but when numerous guns used in crimes come back to one person you would think there could be a case. For years i have read that many guns used in NYC come back to GA legal sales. I highly doubt that thousands of guns are being traced back to thousands of different people. It's a small group of people doing this.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top