Student suspended from high school pending a police investigation that he used poor judgement in post on Snapchat
We need to ensure that your "when" is an "if" or better still; not even a possibility." Loveland High School–the school suspending Nathan–is operating in line with a program called “Safe 2 Tell.”
It's always a school "administration", "administrator" or some ding-bat "teacher". They will ALL be part of the "Authoritarian Bureaucracy" that will "rule" when the DEMOCRAT-Left takes over.
It's all going to turn out well.This is not the first time TVSD and Loveland High School have called into question Nathan and his family ... When Nathan was a freshman, he was caught doodling a Glock 45 in class.
... He was not suspended that time, but school administration required his dad to sign a statement allowing him back into class, Nathan said. He has also been questioned about a Second Amendment sticker on his truck, his mother said.
The language used on this video is ambiguous, but still benign. Though one still has to know their audience.Click bait headline.
Here's the real one:
While we all have opinions, the proper authorities are making those determinations.The language used on this video is ambiguous, but still benign. Though one still has to know their audience.
There weren't any threats made that I could tell. I feel like the lack of information here is what caused the problem. If the video had simply read "Headed to the range" maybe it would have been better.
Others feel, after a fact, that it's high time these school officials are held accountable whenever they fail to respond, right?Its high time these school officials are held accountable whenever these overblown knee jerk reactions occur!
The schools anticipated that strategy years ago. In fact, schools cannot be sued for LACK of action of this level.Like I said - lawsuit, suspension or termination, public apology; start doing that to more of these idiot administrators and this crap will stop immediately.
Because of governmental immunity, public schools are protected by certain types of lawsuits. Governmental immunity protects the government from interference from lawsuits and makes it easier for the government to make decisions.
However, governmental immunity has its limits. Immunity varies from state to state, but essentially a government agency cannot claim immunity when gross negligence or willful misconduct was involved.
Exactly my point! The kid did nothing wrong, made no threats simply posted some online pics from a range session with his mom. That's all it took for some bed wetting hoplophobe to decide the kid posed a threat and over react..I did nothing WRONG and Neither Did this kid. But screwed by the same fugged system.
That's one way of looking at it.Exactly my point! The kid did nothing wrong, made not threats simply posted some online pics from a range session with his mom. That's all it took for some bed wetting hoplophobe to decide the kid posed a threat and over react.
You got a mouse in your pocket? I didn't ask any of those people to do any of those things.On the one hand, we encourage, "see something, say something," on the other, we body-slam the whistle-blower.
Posting that very same video with the very same content, intent and frame of mind on this forum would cause us all to be jealous and reply in a positive way.
It's kinda inherently obvious to the casual observer that right now is not a good time to post stuff like this kid did, to the audience he did.
It's simply a matter of poor judgement.
The kid who reported the video did what we asked of them.
The school did, by way of signed policy, did what we asked of them.
The kid who posted the video will do what we ask of him.
Going forward, other kids will be the wiser.
There was a history, though not very solid:
It's all going to turn out well.
