They've already turned off the power twice this year.
Or their OHVs running aroundAm sure many have generators by now.
Up north, they can start fires with the exhaust of their generators at the wood pile.
You won't see it there because that;s SMUD territoryYou'll never see Sacramento County on a list like that. PG&E knows when the legislators and bureaucrats are impacted by their little 'revenge game'... the game is over.
(Popeye, please correct me if I'm wrong.)I am sure that there are reasons why California is having power outages, .......
OK, thanks. The first 2 reasons makes me think that this is self-inflicted, but who am I to judge. I do not see things getting better in that state, only worse.(Popeye, please correct me if I'm wrong.)
PG&E is trying to avoid another wildfire caused by their equipment. There is a high risk of wildfires due to .....
1. PG&E (the electric company covering most of California) has been focused on profits and neglected their equipment and right of ways for too many years.
2. California's failure to maintain and manage it's forests, by banning controlled burns and timber logging. Thus leaving the forests to grow wild, resulting in undergrowth and dead timber.
3. California's drought conditions.
1 - not true. PG&E covers most of NORTHERN CA(Popeye, please correct me if I'm wrong.)
PG&E is trying to avoid another wildfire caused by their equipment. There is a high risk of wildfires due to .....
1. PG&E (the electric company covering most of California) has been focused on profits and neglected their equipment and right of ways for too many years.
2. California's failure to maintain and manage it's forests, by banning controlled burns and timber logging. Thus leaving the forests to grow wild, resulting in undergrowth and dead timber.
3. California's drought conditions.
And to insure continuing profits, PG&E refused to spend the money necessary to upgrade their equipment. Believe it or not, PG&E continues to use equipment designed and built in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s to generate and deliver electricity and natural gas. This, combined with an overworked and understaffed maintenance department, is the reason PG&E equipment starts fires Fires exacerbated by shortsighted and agenda driven forest managment policies but, nonetheless, fires started by PG&E. In other words, negligent arson resulting in negligent homicide.1 - not true. PG&E covers most of NORTHERN CA
They are an IOU, which means they have shareholders to consider, many of which are Calpers state union folks
Gee, and SoCal get power from a dam built in the 30s; when I worked over the hill for a utility, a lot of the service in the Tahoe basin was form the forties with tress being used as "power poles". The brunt of the damage and death was caused by state folks who refused to do proper forestry management. Had the dry underbrush been properly handled the fires would not have been as catastrophic.And to insure continuing profits, PG&E refused to spend the money necessary to upgrade their equipment. Believe it or not, PG&E continues to use equipment designed and built in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s to generate and deliver electricity and natural gas. This, combined with an overworked and understaffed maintenance department, is the reason PG&E equipment starts fires Fires exacerbated by shortsighted and agenda driven forest managment policies but, nonetheless, fires started by PG&E. In other words, negligent arson resulting in negligent homicide.
As to the power 'interruptions'; unfortunately, they are necessary. The Judge overseeing the PG&E criminal case was going to force PG&E to shout down ALL power delivery whenever the wind exceded 20 mph due to PG&E's antiquated and poorly maintained equipment. PG&E convinced the Judge to accept the current, targeted, power interruptions.