National Gun Forum banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

· Keep calm & return fire!
Joined
·
14,178 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

Mayor Lori Lightfoot defended the Chicago Police Department’s ban on protesters being able to demonstrate on the block where she lives, telling reporters Thursday that she and her family at times require heightened security because of threats she receives daily.
Lightfoot refused to elaborate on the specific threats, but said she receives them daily against herself, her wife and her home. Comparisons to how the Police Department has protected previous mayors’ homes, such as Rahm Emanuel’s Ravenswood residence, are unfair because “this is a different time like no other,” Lightfoot told reporters.

‘Fort Lori’: Chicago police ban protests on Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s block, order arrests for anyone who won’t leave »

“I think that residents of this city, understanding the nature of the threats that we are receiving on a daily basis, on a daily basis, understand I have a right to make sure that my home is secure,” Lightfoot said.
Lightfoot and Chicago police Superintendent David Brown were asked at an unrelated news conference about a Tribune report noting police have banned protesters from demonstrating on her block in the Logan Square neighborhood, ordering officers to arrest anyone who refuses to leave.
The directive surfaced in a July email from then-Shakespeare District Cmdr. Melvin Roman to officers under his command. It did not distinguish between the peaceful protesters Lightfoot regularly says she supports and those who might intend to be destructive, but ordered that after a warning is given to demonstrators, “It should be locked down.”

Activists and police sources could not cite instances when the city repeatedly locked down her predecessor Emanuel’s block against protesters. The Kenwood block where former President Barack Obama lived with his family when his primary residence was in Chicago was shut down for access only by residents after his election.
But Lightfoot said such comparisons “don’t make any sense,” after Brown referenced the ongoing coronavirus pandemic as well as civil unrest that have flared since the George Floyd killing at the hands of Minneapolis police.
“I’m not going to make any excuses for the fact that, given the threats I have personally received, given the threats to my home and my family, I’m going to do everything I can to make sure they’re protected,” Lightfoot said. “I make no apologies whatsoever for that.”

Since the order, and even for a time just prior to its writing, Chicago cops have repeatedly blocked protesters’ access to the block with groups of officers and barricades. Police have often kept protesters contained at the nearby corner of Kimball and Wrightwood avenues, though one standoff between activists and officers last month saw police go as far as bringing in an armored vehicle in case things got out of hand.

Aside from the expanded police presence to block protesters from reaching her home, Lightfoot already receives 24/7 protection from cops including officers stationed at the residence. The aggressive policing has sometimes siphoned away resources from the area’s police district, some sources with knowledge of the situation said, leading to quiet grumbling.

Both Lightfoot and Brown noted there are laws on the books banning residential protests, but Brown acknowledged the Police Department does not always enforce them. Brown said the city tries to give “wiggle room” for protesters.
Brown also cited instances where peaceful protests have been “hijacked” by agitators as reason for keeping demonstrators off Lightfoot’s block.
“We have seen very peaceful First Amendment protests for the most part but embedded in each of those protests have been very violent people. And they’re embedded. They put up umbrellas. And they come for a fight,” Brown said. “So we have to prepare for what we’ve seen.”
 

· Registered
Joined
·
367 Posts
Elitist minded hypocrites one and all !!!


Well, I'll take that ^^^ back if she made absolutely sure that not one of the cops were armed with anything more than a night stick.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,665 Posts
The state and city’s ineffective leaders are all the product of a progressive ruling elite that promoted them beyond their competence because they helped advance political goals.
Given their backgrounds, it’s no surprise that the trio of Foxx, Lightfoot, and Pritzker has done nothing to halt the state and city’s decline.

They have also failed to sustain the first condition of civilization: order under law.
One feels almost nostalgic for the days when Chicago was run by a Democratic political machine that at least understood this cardinal principle of statecraft.

In effect, Chicago has been run over twice.
First, machine politics left it with a huge financial and trust deficit among many of its citizens.
Now, progressive politics threaten to undermine the legal order, the foundation of the economic growth that the city needs to climb out of its deep hole.
Chicago was sick even before the looting and riots of 2020, but things could get worse still. The city could become another Detroit.

 

· Registered
Joined
·
17,522 Posts
Typical hypocrite liberal idiot. If they are so peaceful and have the right to protest what the heck is her problem? She is forbidding them to peacefully protest at the place of their choice.....yet they call Trump the nazi dictator.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
18,036 Posts
Typical hypocrite liberal idiot. If they are so peaceful and have the right to protest what the heck is her problem? She is forbidding them to peacefully protest at the place of their choice.....yet they call Trump the nazi dictator.
She is blaming Trump supporters for the threats, so it's Trumps fault.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
22,060 Posts
"It's just baffling she doesn't see anything wrong with this."

Here are some of the clues that have escaped you: She is black, "married-lesbian", DEMOCRAT, holds a high elected position, and is filled up with "Woke-attitude".
 

· Keep calm & return fire!
Joined
·
14,178 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
So, she and her family have a right to be safe???
I suppose the folks that voted her into office don't have any rights according to her.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Thats exactly how I see it!.
SHE has right to be safe, screw the other 2.7 million people living in Chicago. That right doesn't apply to them.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,756 Posts
So, she and her family have a right to be safe???
I suppose the folks that voted her into office don't have any rights according to her.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
It is a typical mindset for a extreme left socialist DemocRAT: the only people who are in need of protection, are those who are members of the "elite", if you are a member of the masses, you do not need or deserve protection, after all, you primary job is to serve the "elites".
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top