National Gun Forum banner

Glock is not the best handgun design ever

2849 Views 26 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  QuickdrawMcgraw
Glock is not the best handgun design ever
Posted by BearingArms.com Staff

Gen3
Is there a gun fanboy equivalent of Godwin’s Law? Gaston’s Law, maybe?

It seems that no matter what handgun you mention on the internet, someone—if the comments threat is long enough—is going to claim that their Glock is the superior handgun even if the comparison is relatively absurd.

Pocket carry? Buy a Glock!

Hunting? Buy a Glock!

You get the picture.

Now, we’re not putting down Glocks. Far from it. We’re actually big fans of Smyrna, Georgia’s combat tupperware, and there are professionals with a heck of a lot more knowledge than we’re ever likely to amass that also swear by them, and for good reason.

The basic design adopted and refined from the original G17 decades ago is a generally reliable, reasonably accurate, middle-of-the-road handgun with solid factory support and a wealth of accessories. As police and military units around the world will tell you, it is a great general purpose handgun, especially when a handgun has to be deployed across a large organization.
But…

The grip angle simply doesn’t point naturally for a lot of people.

Until Generation 4’s replaceable backstraps, it didn’t fit a lot of people’s hands (and for some, it still doesn’t work).

The polymer factory sights are “meh” for most, and replacing them is the bread-and-butter of many Glock armorers.

They can and do blow-up.
Glocks are good guns for many people, but they aren’t everything for everyone. Let’s try to stay sane out there, okay?


READ MORE -BLOW UP - ==>[X]

Have a good cigar and regards
As-salāmu ʿalaykum
ARMARIN

See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
glock......probably the most successful handgun marketing campaign since Samuel Colt himself...
Gen. 1-3 are the most reliable out-of-the-box pistols.
Somehow Glock pistols are the most hated among latent homosexuals.
No design is going to appreciated by everyone, not matter how well it works. For handguns I refuse to buy a model that has a safety, and I know many people that refuse to buy handguns that don't have safeties. Its just a fundamental difference in opinion. As for reliability, some people like to get caught up in the stereotypes and name calling and ignore that Glocks are one of the most reliable hand guns of all time. Yes, they have their issues, but so does literally every other gun ever made (and I don't use the word 'literally' lightly).
glock is not the best handgun design ever

duh! Text Yellow Font Emoticon Icon
See less See more
Oh, I'm putting down glocks. Any pistol you can't uncock, without totally unloading it, has a deficiency. Single action, no safety, and you can't uncock it. What a prize.

I won'r say thing about their AD record except to mention-is it any surprise they have a syndrome named after them, when they are the auto-loading equivalent of running around with a loaded and cocked revolver? At least with the cocked revolver, you can see that the hammer is cocked to the rear. (OH, yeah, and uncock it, while loaded)
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Oh, I'm putting down glocks. Any pistol you can't uncock, without totally unloading it, has a deficiency. Single action, no safety, and you can't uncock it. What a prize.

I won'r say thing about their AD record except to mention-is it any surprise they have a syndrome named after them, when they are the auto-loading equivalent of running around with a loaded and cocked revolver? At least with the cocked revolver, you can see that the hammer is cocked to the rear. (OH, yeah, and uncock it, while loaded)
+1
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
wow, just...wow.
I like glocks but i don't love them To me they are the pistol version of AR's Anyone with money if their wallet and a punch and customize them with all kinds of after market stuff. They shoot well and are reliable. They are butt ugly and bulky too for the most part. I own a 17 and used to own a 21 and if asked would i ever buy another my answer would be sure right after i bought a bunch of other handguns that are much higher on my list.
it is probably one of the more "polarizing" handguns amongst the gun owners.........

i could shoot one proficiently and carry it safely if i wanted to......key word "if".................too many other wants at the moment.
One search on google for "glock feeding problems" will show you the brand is no more reliable than any other well respected brand in the market. It is just marketing.
Lots of personal opinions and excuses, which became "truths" over the years, in the ops thread. As for not being drop safe? P320 anyone? Glocks are drop safe from the factory. The safeties on the Glock? If you cant keep your finger off the trigger then its your issue not the firearms. Grip angle? Please. I've seen the threads in the past on grip angle and "Glock go boom" and quit a few were from the same person spamming lots of different firearm forums. Every manufacture has had their firearms go boom for one reason or another, M$P anyone? S$W revolvers anyone?

In the article the writer said the shooter saw there was an issue with the firearm, yet he continued to fire it. I have no sympathy for the shooter nor does this article hold water on "Glocks go boom". Part of being safe, and this is taught, is to know your firearm and if there is a problem - stop firing! He didn't and kept shooting. Not the firearms problem. Everyone can see that there is an issue with the chamber / feed lip of the barrel and yet he kept firing it. If you ask me it looks to be that firearm was shot a lot or someone used a dermal to polish the feed rap and went over board. I might be wrong just this is what it looks like.

Accuracy? For the most part spot on. Accuracy fail on the part of the firearm itself is not where it should be, this lies on the shooter.
Feeding issues from what I have seen all can relate to worn out springs, different magazines, or people not griping the firearm properly.


Why don't we hear the excuse (grip angle) from people not wanting 1911s? F&N's? H&K? Seems to be not the in thing to do and is shrugged off when someone does complain bout it. I teach classes and offer my students lots of firearms to try, after they passed their test. In my class I recommend them not buying a Glock or a 1911 for their first firearm until they are use to carrying n have practiced more on their shooting skills n what they learned in class.
Now I hear from them how certain firearms don't fit their hand, to wide, to small, to big, grip angle on this one n that. This is with 1911s, S$W revolvers, Ruger revolvers, Glocks, F&N's ect. etc. I've heard it for pretty much every carry firearm, though not as promidently on the forums such with Glock. As if its the ONLY one with someone personal issue. Seems some people's mission is wanting Glock to be the king on how the grip angle sucks. Or wanting to prove how they know more then you. SO to keep hearing from keyboard "mercenaries" in the tropical jungles of Serbia, who work as a cashier at local Walmart on why Glocks suck, is the reason why these opinions and myths (Glock go boom) keep getting brought up...trolling imo.


If one isn't able to understand the safeties and why they are the way they are or even know what and where they are, then its their issue.
There have been firearm manufactures following Glocks design of their safeties, its modularity, and the dismantling of it - to the point of one manufacture being sued over it.

We all have our firearms we like and give and take in the heckling department. Me? I personally like Rugers and Sringfields, that's just me. Though Glock is in my top five and have a few of them. I have never seen a firearm take so much heat as Glock does on these forums. Even Taurus doesn't get this much :). Its a good, reliable, well thought of, snd n average priced firearm for most models. Its just an plain looking firearm with the KISS label of the firearm world and works.



PS: Oh n the "its ugly" is a childish excuse. THOUGH if you want ugly? Get a High Point :smile5:





Thread will stay open for a little while longer.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Have [accidentally] dropped my EDC G26, with loaded chamber, countless times.
We bot are still alive, lol!
Personal opinion.......

I think Glocks are just as good as any other striker fired handgun out there. Are they better?.....no. Are they worse?....no.
Do I or would I own one?...nope. They are not for me. They don’t fit me ergonomically but I don’t dislike them.
I believe that they can be absolutely abused and they’ll still go bang,bang,bang.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Glock is the best designed handgun out there, and that is coming from a revolver and 1911 fan. Gaston Glock changed the gun world, as much as Samuel Colt did.
Glock is the best designed handgun out there, and that is coming from a revolver and 1911 fan. Gaston Glock changed the gun world, as much as Samuel Colt did.


Ok so what exactly did he do that wasn't done before? Polymer frame? Was done at least 10 years prior. Striker fired? Was done many many years prior, maybe 75 years. Safe action trigger? Not sure if they invented that or not. Just curious on your thoughts why it was so revolutionary to be compared to what Colt did.
I'll throw this out there...... Polymer frame was done on one other pistol to hit the American market, before glock, so it wasn't like polymer frame pistols were abundant like today. If I remember right it was the VP. Not a pleasant firearm to shoot with its heavy trigger pull and want to talk ugly? Well, this one is a step above the High Point. We wont even go into grip angle on this one.

Glock used marketing in America plus used their firearms reliability and light weight to get their pistol out there in the American market. I do believe the safe action trigger was a first, coupled with the quick disassemble nd reassemble, simple design, very light weight frame - at the time, 15 to 17 round well built standard magazines, and priced well.

Revolutionary? From what we see being built today, imo, yes. Glock did start something which all other firearm companies follow today, in one way or the other. Though them being the first in using polymer in their firearm? No, this is not true. Nylon 66 would be first to use polymer / plastic in the United States. Glock use Browning's tilt barrel locking breach? Pretty much every firearm manufacture has used / is using and still uses this in their firearms.
See less See more
I just like to watch Glock fanbois have meltdowns, and I own two Glocks. Used to own three, but after ten rounds out the box and the rails breaking I got rid of it. To be honest I do not trust the two I still have to carry.
The Heckler & Koch VP70 is a polymer-framed, striker fired, 18 round pistol that predates the Glock 17 by 12 years.

As I understand it, Gaston Glock ran a plastics manufacturing factory that made curtain rods and other sundry household items. I'm also told that he contracted firearms engineers to design the pistol and since he paid them, was able to patent their work. Several years later, and after a huge marketing campaign, sales of the pistol took off. The rest is history.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
^^^^^ and on that note. I have a H&K VP9 that is one of the best build most comfortable handguns i’ve ever held.
Take it over a Glock any day.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top