National Gun Forum banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Grand Imperial Poobah
Joined
·
29,491 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·




A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday ruled that California's ban on the sale of semiautomatic weapons to adults under 21 is unconstitutional, a move gun-rights advocates hope will pave the way for similar rulings in other courts.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the law violates the Second Amendment and that a San Diego judge should have blocked what is called the "an almost total ban on semiautomatic centerfire rifles" for young adults.

"America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army," Judge Ryan Nelson wrote in the 2-1 ruling. "Today we reaffirm that our Constitution still protects the right that enabled their sacrifice: the right of young adults to keep and bear arms."

A dissent was written by U.S. District Court Judge Sidney Stein, who was assigned to the panel from the Southern District of New York.

The Firearms Policy Coalition, which brought the case, said the ruling makes it optimistic age-based gun bans will be overturned in other courts.

"Today’s decision confirms that peaceable legal adults cannot be prohibited from acquiring firearms and exercising their rights enshrined in the Second Amendment," FPC Vice President of Programs Adam Kraut said in a statement to Fox News. "We are pleased to see progress on this important legal front and optimistic that similar results will come from our many other challenges to age-based bans filed in courts across the United States."

However, the ruling was not a total victory for gun rights advocates.

They had sought to block the state from requiring a hunting license for purchases of rifles or shotguns by adults under 21 who are not in the military or law enforcement.

The court ruled the hunting license requirement was reasonable for increasing public safety through "sensible firearm control."

In a statement to Fox News, a spokesperson for California Attorney General Rob Bonta said his office is reviewing the court's decision.

"California will continue to take all necessary steps to prevent and reduce gun violence," the statement said. "We remain committed to defending California’s commonsense gun laws, which save lives and make our communities safer."

The sales ban went into effect in 2019.

Matthew Jones, a 20-year-old at the time from Santee in San Diego County, was the lead plaintiff in the case. He said he wanted a gun for self-defense and other lawful purposes but didn't want to obtain a hunting license.

Matthew Jones, a 20-year-old at the time from Santee in San Diego County, was the lead plaintiff in the case. He said he wanted a gun for self-defense and other lawful purposes but didn't want to obtain a hunting license.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gvaldeg1

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
15,975 Posts
The hunting license part is total hogwash. And, it sets a terrible precedent by tying gun sales to hunting. A person should be able to purchase a gun for no other reason other than they want it, if there needs to be any reason at all.... which there doesn't need to be.

Alan
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
9,283 Posts
The only positive aspect to the required hunting license is that there would be at least some minimal education on safety. While it shouldn’t be and really can’t be a law on gun purchases, it’s not a terrible idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Popeye

·
Grand Imperial Poobah
Joined
·
29,491 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Attaching a minimal education requirement to vote would also be a good idea, but try to implement such a requirement and watch the left go crazy.
 

·
Ancient Gaseous Emanation
Joined
·
57,118 Posts
The only positive aspect to the required hunting license is that there would be at least some minimal education on safety. While it shouldn’t be and really can’t be a law on gun purchases, it’s not a terrible idea.
Good idea?
or
Infringement?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,808 Posts
The hunting license part is total hogwash. And, it sets a terrible precedent by tying gun sales to hunting. A person should be able to purchase a gun for no other reason other than they want it, if there needs to be any reason at all.... which there doesn't need to be.

Alan
The part I find ironic is for years the left tells us you don;t need a semi auto for hunting but then say you can't buy a semi auto unless you're going to hunt. I wish they could put 3 brains cells together and make up their minds.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,808 Posts
Attaching a minimal education requirement to vote would also be a good idea, but try to implement such a requirement and watch the left go crazy.
We can't even get them to prove who they are and you want them to prove they are smart?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mad Scientist

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,293 Posts
"America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army," Judge Ryan Nelson wrote in the 2-1 ruling. "Today we reaffirm that our Constitution still protects the right that enabled their sacrifice: the right of young adults to keep and bear arms."

The court ruled the hunting license requirement was reasonable for increasing public safety through "sensible firearm control."

So do you need a hunting license in order to join the military :unsure:
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top