Tips on a Scope for my .270
Advertise with us Click for Rates
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    jdhutto
    Guest

    Default Tips on a Scope for my .270

    I just got a tikka .270 and I want to outfit it with a scope pretty soon. I am most likely going to get a 3-9x40, and I want some suggestions. I just need a good all around scope, I will not be taking any really long shots. I am also not going to spend a fortune on a scope, one day I will, but not now. I have been looking at a Leupold VX-1, and also a few Nikon scopes. I would like a scope thats fairly bright when it starts to get dark. What would you go with (on a budget of around 300 or less)?

    thanks, any feedback would be appreciated

  2. #2
    The 500 S&W stare... NGF Addict! bigweatherby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South-West Michigan
    Posts
    10,304

    Default

    Leupold VX-II would be a great choice. Nikon has good scopes as does Sightron.
    If I had a dollar for every brain Obama DIDN'T have, I would have one dollar.

    Happiness is campfire light reflecting off your sons smiling face.

    Just because I am paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.

    You don't truly begin to live your life until you begin to share it with your child.

    "12 gauge autoloader"
    "45 longslide with laser sighting"
    "Phase plasma rifle with a 40 watt range."
    "Hey. Just what ya see buddy!"

  3. #3
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,326

    Default

    a 1.5-6x will cover everything you need for a .270. Most shooters get too much power at the bottom end. I have a 2-7x leupold on my .30-06 and like it better than the 3.5-10x50 leupold I have on my AR15. If Leupold had a 1.5-6x I would have bought one.
    Last edited by SharonAnne; 11-13-2008 at 02:34 AM. Reason: forgetful
    Blessed Be

    SharonAnne


    I'm alright - it only hurts when I breathe!

  4. Remove Advertisements
    NationalGunForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member brandonsuperglide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    811

    Default

    I bought a Nikon Prostaff 3-9x40 a few weeks ago. So far I really like it.
    You've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

  6. #5
    Big Honkin' Daddy NGF Addict! Gunzzi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Heartland, Ohio
    Posts
    1,247

    Default

    Check out the Burris Fullfield II for under $200.00

    NRA member
    Warning! May contain lead
    The land of the free BECAUSE of the brave!
    I don't dial 911 - I use .357

  7. #6
    The 500 S&W stare... NGF Addict! bigweatherby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South-West Michigan
    Posts
    10,304

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SharonAnne View Post
    a 1.5-6x will cover everything you need for a .270. Most shooters get too much power at the bottom end. I have a 2-7x leupold on my .30-06 and like it better than the 3.5-10x50 leupold I have on my AR15. If Leupold had a 1.5-6x I would have bought one.
    I think they offer that in the LPS line. But $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
    If I had a dollar for every brain Obama DIDN'T have, I would have one dollar.

    Happiness is campfire light reflecting off your sons smiling face.

    Just because I am paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.

    You don't truly begin to live your life until you begin to share it with your child.

    "12 gauge autoloader"
    "45 longslide with laser sighting"
    "Phase plasma rifle with a 40 watt range."
    "Hey. Just what ya see buddy!"

  8. #7
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,326

    Default

    BW, the LPS was not available when I bought the compact 2-7x
    Blessed Be

    SharonAnne


    I'm alright - it only hurts when I breathe!

  9. #8
    Texas Legal Gunslinger NGF Addict! TX1911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Southwest of Houston, Texas
    Posts
    3,531

    Default

    Another vote for either the Leupold or the Burris. I had the Fullfield II on my .30-06 until recently. Now it's on my AR. It's been a great scope thus far (6 years and counting)!
    The Constitution preserves "the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. . . (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." -- The Federalist, No. 46 - James Madison

    Life Member - Texas State Rifle Association
    Life Member - National Rifle Association

  10. #9
    Ancient Gaseous Emanation Popeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sacramento area, CA
    Posts
    53,499

    Default

    In my opinion the Leupold VX-1 is not a good scope. It is over priced. You get to pay for the name and not much else.

    A Nikon BuckMaster is a superior scope,
    A Bushnell Elite 3200 is a superior scope,
    A Burris Fullfield II is a superior scope,
    Even a Nikon ProStaff is a superior scope when compaired to a Leupold VX-1.
    The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.

  11. #10
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The Mountains
    Posts
    2,919

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brandonsuperglide View Post
    I bought a Nikon Prostaff 3-9x40 a few weeks ago. So far I really like it.
    I have the same scope and feel the same way, no problems, no complaints, seemed to work real well on it's first outing. My sons have the same scopes on their guns, and after one of them made his kill the guide borowed his rifle for visual assistance because I was looking for a longer shot than expected and he didn't have any optical equipment with him. After he used the rifle with the Nikon Prostaff to spot for me, I heard him tell one of the other guides this: "I was using one of the kids rifles to look get better ID on the deer and I could see evrything beautifully through that Nikon Prostaff. That scope was really good". I had nothing to do with that conversation, but it made me feel that I chose a good product. If I remeber correctly they cost about $150.00 at Dicks Sporting Goods. I don't know that much about scopes but I thought that was a good buy for the money. Friends that hunt alot and spend more tell me that Swarovski is one of the better makes. I've also been using a Leupold 1X4 on my rifled shot gun and that has always served me well. I once asked whats the difference between a high priced quality scope and a lesser quality cheaper one. I was told that the cheaper ones will not hold their zero as well becuase they are not as solidly made, and they have a tendecy to fog up easier.
    I have a couple of real cheap scopes on my .22's that I shoot no more than 100 yards and I've had no problems with them either.
    That's all I can tell you, good luck!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Search tags for this page

    tips on 270 rifle

    Click on a term to search for related topics.

    Tags for this Thread