Trump's Cabinet Nominations Don't Share Mission of Assigned Agency
Advertise with us Click for Rates
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By Popeye
  • 1 Post By therewolf
  • 1 Post By foxytwo

Thread: Trump's Cabinet Nominations Don't Share Mission of Assigned Agency

  1. #1
    Ancient Gaseous Emanation Popeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sacramento area, CA
    Posts
    52,054

    Default Trump's Cabinet Nominations Don't Share Mission of Assigned Agency

    Charles Krauthammer
    16 Dec 2016


    Democrats spent the first two decades of the post-Cold War era rather relaxed about Russian provocations and revanchism. President Obama famously mocked Mitt Romney in 2012 for suggesting that Russia was our principal geopolitical adversary. Yet today the Dems are in high dudgeon over the closeness of secretary of state nominee, Rex Tillerson, to Vladimir Putin.

    Hypocrisy aside, it is true that, as head of Exxon Mobil, Tillerson made major deals with Russia, received Russia's Order of Friendship and opposed U.S. sanctions. That's troubling but not necessarily disqualifying. At the time, after all, Tillerson was acting as an agent of Exxon Mobil, whose interest it is to extract oil and make money.

    These interests do not necessarily overlap with those of the United States. The relevant question is whether and how Tillerson distinguishes between the two and whether as agent of the United States he would adopt a tougher Russia policy than he did as agent of Exxon Mobil. We don't know. We shall soon find out. That's what confirmation hearings are for.

    The left has been in equally high dudgeon that other Cabinet picks appear not to share the mission of the agency which they have been nominated to head. The horror! As if these agency missions are somehow divinely ordained. Why, they aren't even constitutionally ordained. The Department of Education, for example, was created by President Carter in 1979 as a payoff to the teachers' unions for their political support.

    Now, teachers are wonderful. But teachers' unions are there to protect benefits and privileges, not necessarily to improve schooling. Which is why they zealously defend tenure, protect their public-school monopoly and reflexively oppose school choice.

    Conservatives have the odd view that the purpose of schooling — and therefore of the Department of Education — is to provide students with the best possible education. Hence Trump's nominee, Betsy DeVos, a longtime and passionate proponent of school choice, under whom the department will no longer be an arm of the teachers' unions.

    She is also less likely to allow the department's Office for Civil Rights to continue appropriating to itself the role of arbiter of social justice, micromanaging everything from campus sexual mores to the proper bathroom assignment for transgender students. If the mission of this department has been to dictate policy best left to the states and localities, it's about time the mission was changed.

    The most incendiary nomination by far, however, is Scott Pruitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency. As attorney general of Oklahoma, he has joined or led a series of lawsuits to curtail EPA power. And has been upheld more than once by the courts.

    Pruitt has been deemed unfit to serve because he fails liberalism's modern-day religious test: belief in anthropogenic climate change. They would love to turn his confirmation hearing into a Scopes monkey trial. Republicans should decline the invitation. It doesn't matter whether the man believes the moon is made of green cheese. The challenges to EPA actions are based not on meteorology or theology, but on the Constitution. The issue is that the EPA has egregiously exceeded its authority and acted as a rogue agency unilaterally creating rules unmoored from legislation.

    Pruitt's is the most important nomination because it is a direct attack on the insidious growth of the administrative state. We have reached the point where EPA bureaucrats interpret the Waters of the United States rule — meant to protect American waterways — to mean that when a hard rain leaves behind a pond on your property, the feds may take over and tell you what you can and cannot do with it. (The final rule excluded puddles — magnanimity from the Leviathan.)

    On a larger scale, Obama's Clean Power Plan essentially federalizes power generation and regulation, not coincidentally killing coal along the way. This is the administration's end run around Congress' rejection of Obama's proposed 2009-2010 cap-and-trade legislation. And that was a Democratic Congress, mind you.

    Pruitt's nomination is a dramatic test of the proposition that agencies administer the law, they don't create it. That the legislative power resides exclusively with Congress and not with a metastasizing administrative bureaucracy.

    For some, this reassertion of basic constitutionalism seems extreme. If so, the Obama administration has only itself to blame. Such are the wages of eight years of liberal overreach. Some legislation, like Obamacare, will be repealed. Some executive orders will be canceled. But most important will be the bonfire of the agencies. We may soon be secure not just in our puddles but our ponds.




    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    1shot1k and larry like this.
    The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.

  2. #2
    Senior Member NGF Addict! PrairieHunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Black Hills of South Dakota
    Posts
    5,598

    Default

    The entire Trump Administration is heading for failure.
    Doesn't anyone know? The Demoncrats have clearly established. The Administrations goal is to destroy the US of A. Drown it in Muslim, Sharia Law. Pillage all it's wealth. Make it into a third world country.
    "​My dog sleeps with me, and we both snore."

  3. #3
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Southern Kalifornia
    Posts
    17,021

    Default

    "The left has been in equally high dudgeon that other Cabinet picks appear not to share the mission of the agency which they have been nominated to head. The horror! As if these agency missions are somehow divinely ordained. Why, they aren't even constitutionally ordained.

    But most important will be the bonfire of the agencies."

    Government as dictated thru rules created by unelected sluggo bureaucrats. What a farce, albeit an oppressive and dangerous one.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    NationalGunForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    ........................................
    Posts
    4,399

    Default

    I'm a patriotic American. I spent my time upon the wall. But I've talked to people from Russia.

    They're warm, friendly, good cooks. They have loving families. I know not what plans their leaders

    may have, but i feel we may have been misled, lo these many years. The average Russian Joe or

    Jane is just a normal guy or gal, like us, who happens to have grown up in Russia. They don't dream

    of eating our children, regardless of what you may have been taught, by the media.



    As for the EPA, they have plenty of their own messes to clean up right now, don't they?
    PrairieHunt likes this.

  6. #5
    Senior Member foxytwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Obama, I think I heard the name somewhere. Looking forward to the future.
    PrairieHunt likes this.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)