Family Sues DEA and TSA After Elderly Man's Life Savings Were Seized at Airport
Terrence Rolin kept his life savings in a Tupperware container, but all that money now belongs to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), even though the 79-year-old retired railroad engineer hasn't been charged with a crime.
When Rolin's daughter, Rebecca Brown, tried to take her fathers' savings—$82,373 in cash—on an airplane, a DEA agent seized it simply because large amounts of cash are considered suspicious by the agency.
Brown and Rolin are now the lead plaintiffs in a federal class-action [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] filed Wednesday by the Institute for Justice, a libertarian-leaning public interest law firm, challenging the DEA and TSA's practice of seizing large amounts of cash from airline passengers without any evidence of any underlying crime.
"Flying with any amount of cash is completely legal, but once again we see government agents treating American citizens like criminals," Institute for Justice senior attorney Dan Alban said in a press release. "You don't forfeit your constitutional rights when you try to board an airplane. It is time for TSA and federal law enforcement to stop seizing cash from travelers simply because the government considers certain amounts of cash 'suspicious.'"
Rolin and Brown's trouble started last August. Rolin had asked his daughter to take his money and open a joint savings account, the Washington Post [Only registered and activated users can see links. ].
Rebecca Brown was catching a flight home from the Pittsburgh airport early the next day and said she didn't have time to stop at a bank. She confirmed on a government website that it's legal to carry any amount of cash on a domestic flight and tucked the money in her carry-on.
But just minutes before departure in late August, a Drug Enforcement Administration agent met her at the busy gate and questioned her about the cash, which showed up on a security scan. He insisted Brown put Rolin on the phone to confirm her story. Brown said Rolin, who is suffering mental decline, was unable to verify some details.
"He just handed me the phone and said, 'Your stories don't match,'" Brown recalled the agent saying. "'We're seizing the cash.'"
The DEA then notified Brown that it was seeking to permanently forfeit Rolin's life savings. Neither Rolin or Brown have been charged with a crime.
In the meantime, the lawsuit says the loss of Rolin's savings has left him unable to fix his truck, which is his primary means of transportation, or get needed dental work.
"My father and his parents worked hard for this money, and the government shouldn't be able to reach into his pocket and take it," Brown said a press release. "We did nothing wrong and haven't been charged with any crime, yet the DEA is trying to take my father's life savings. His savings should be returned right away, and the government should stop taking money from Americans who are doing something completely legal."
In cases like Brown's, the DEA seizes cash using civil asset forfeiture, a practice that allows police to seize cash and property suspected of being connected to criminal activity, even if the owner is not charged with a crime.
Federal, state, and local law enforcement seize millions of dollars in cash every year in drug interdiction operations, much of being transported along highways and through airports. In 2016, a USA Today[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] found the DEA seized more than $209 million from at least 5,200 travelers in 15 major airports over the previous decade.
Police groups say civil forfeiture is a vital tool that allows them to disrupt drug trafficking by targeting its illicit proceeds.
However, civil liberties groups say there are few safeguards to protect innocent owners, who bear the burden of challenging the seizure to get their property back.
The Institute for Justice lawsuit claims the DEA has a practice or policy of seizing currency from travelers at U.S. airports without probable cause simply if the dollar amount is greater than $5,000. This practice, the suit argues, violates travelers' Fourth Amendment rights.
In 2016, Reason[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] the case of Charles Clarke, a college student who was robbed of $11,000 dollars at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport by a local police officer who was deputized by the DEA. The officer claimed Clarke's suitcase smelled like marijuana, although no drugs were found in it. Clarke, helped by the Institute for Justice, got his money back in an agreement with the Justice Department.
A 2017 report by the Justice Department Inspector General found that the DEA seized more than $4 billion in cash from people suspected of drug activity over the previous decade, but $3.2 billion of those seizures were never connected to any criminal charges.
The report reviewed 100 cash seizures and found that only 44 of those were connected to or advanced a criminal investigation. The majority of seizures occurred in airports, train stations, and bus terminals, where the DEA [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] on travel records and maintains a network of travel industry employees who act as confidential informants.
A 2016 Justice Department Inspector General report [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] the DEA for recruiting a TSA screener as an informant and promising the screener a cut of the proceeds from forfeited cash that he discovered.
A DEA spokesperson, per the agency's policy, declined to comment on ongoing litigation.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.
I've always wondered what sort of screening process is used by our federal government that allows so many LOSERS to pass muster and be hired into Civil Service.
As Ann Coulter remarked a few years ago, it wasn't the lack of training or experience that was evident with TSA employees that bothered her so much as it was "being felt up by a high school graduate" that she objected to.
TSA. The forever and constant bureaucratic reminder that Osama bin Laden won!
I remember when these laws first came out in the late 80's or 90's. I think they started in GA where there was a main drug corridor coming from FL heading north. At the time they seemed good(but i was young and dumb too) but then it wasn't long before you started hearing stories about people going to buy cars and other things getting their money taken. They are essentially red flag laws for cash.
And armed man is a free man, a disarmed man is a slave.
I remember when travelling with my wife she was asked to remove her flip flops to check for shoe bomb.
I told the guy where do you think she hid it? You can see her entire foot. What a moron.
I get pulled out more times than I can count for wearing a Resistol , boots etc.
Meanwile i see folks in turbans and burkas pass right on through.
"Meanwhile i see folks in turbans and burkas pass right on through. "
That is because the people wearing turbans and burkas are members of the "religion of peace", therefore they are not a treat to anyone. And if you believe this, I have a nice bridge to sell.....................
Progressive = The new Political Correct name for a Communist
A gun on your hip is like the insurance you pay every month that you hope never have to use.
You can vote yourself into Socialism, but you will have to fight your way out of it! - Bearing Arms. com