The New Post-Trump Constitution
Advertise with us Click for Rates
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: The New Post-Trump Constitution

  1. #1
    Ancient Gaseous Emanation Popeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sacramento area, CA
    Posts
    53,256

    Default The New Post-Trump Constitution

    VICTOR DAVIS HANSON
    January 14, 2020


    The Left sees Donald Trump’s comportment, rallies, and tweets as a new low in presidential behavior that justifies extraordinary countermeasures. But Trump’s personal characteristics are idiosyncratic and may or may not become institutionalized by subsequent presidents. And it is not as if liberal icons such as FDR, LBJ, JFK, and Bill Clinton suddenly became saintly in office.

    What is far scarier is the reaction to Trump, in both the constitutional and political sense. What follows are likely the new norms for the next generation of presidents, and they will probably be equally applied to Democrats who implemented them in the Trump era.

    1) Private presidential phone calls with foreign leaders will be leaked and printed in the major media. The point will be not so much to air breaking news as to embarrass the president or to use such disclosures to stymie his foreign policy. Those who leak such information will be canonized as part of a “resistance.” Prominent officials in government will publish anonymous op-eds in the New York Times bragging about how they are daily undermining a new president’s administration.

    2) Impeachment is now a casual affair. It requires no report of illegal or unethical behavior by a special counsel or special prosecutor. It will not be bipartisan but solely the action of the opposition party in the House when it is in the majority.

    Public support will not matter. Much less will it be needed. Impeachment will be applied equally to a first- or second-term presidency. And it will become useful in a reelection year to help drive down an incumbent’s popularity.

    Even when there is no chance of conviction in the Senate — as when the impeachment indictment is weak and the president’s own party controls the upper House — impeachment will nonetheless proceed, because it is now seen as a banal, politicized vote of no confidence and thus an occasionally useful political tool.

    There will be no time limit on or shelf life of a successful impeachment. Once a president is impeached, the writ may simply sit until the House majority feels that the climate or polls are ripe to refer the articles to the Senate for trial, whether in days, weeks, months, or years. The writ’s clauses entailing supposed wrongdoing may post facto grow or shrink as news headlines and presidential popularity gyrate. Impeachment will begin not with a Judiciary Committee but with a House Intelligence Committee, whose chair will decide rules of cross-examination and witness appearances in secret in the basement of the House. Information will be selectively released to the media by the chair of the House Intelligence Committee alone to massage impeachment momentum.

    3) There will be no need to specify “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors” in any impeachment writ against a president. “Obstruction” and the “abuse of power” will do well enough. Either can be defined largely in terms of ongoing policy differences with the opposition party. Obstructing the opposition’s effort to impeach a president and abort his agenda is now an abuse of power.

    4) Special counsels and special prosecutors are now irrelevant. Their appointment will be seen as patently political if not redundant. If such ossified appointees find no evidence of presidential wrongdoing, it will not matter, because their appointments were always designed foremost to embarrass and weaken a president and detract from his role as chief executive rather than find concrete evidence of wrongdoing. Whatever data they find can be used for political advantage, even if it is contradicted by the special counsels’ own eventual conclusions. The key for a special prosecutor will be to draw out the investigation — in terms of time, money, and resources — and serve, in the manner of the new definition of impeachment, as a sword of Damocles over the president’s head.

    5) The Washington top echelon of the CIA, FBI, and NSA will be largely immune from oversight. If they wish to spy on a presidential candidate or curtail the options of a sitting president, they will easily use their powers of surveillance, leaking, and spying for political purposes — purposes mostly defined as protecting the status quo of the permanent government. Upon retirement, such intelligence heads will retain their security clearances and use this inside access to obtain lucrative analyst billets on cable news channels deemed hostile to the incumbent administration. No one will care much when an FBI or CIA director lies under oath to Congress. There will be no indictments when high intelligence officials deliberately mislead federal courts, lie to federal investigators and the public, and conspire to derail political campaigns.

    6) Reverse targeting of political opponents will be the normal behavior of intelligence agencies working closely with an incumbent lame-duck administration. Political rivals and opponents can be surveilled by warrants that are aimed nominally at third-party targets. The names of surveilled political opponents then can be unmasked when presidential appointees request it — the more unmaskings, and the more extraneous they are, the better. And the ensuing information will be leaked to the popular press with impunity.

    7) The media, like academia and Hollywood, are now an extension of the progressive party. The recalibrated education and entertainment industries are expected, as part of their job security, to aid liberal agendas, with no need to worry that they’ll lose their reputations as disinterested and unbiased institutions. There is no longer any such thing as being unbiased. The new mantra is that everyone and all outlets have points of view, so we might as well recognize that there is nothing wrong in expressing and promoting them for political and ideological advantage.

    8) Presidential candidates can hire foreign nationals to aid their campaign by collecting embarrassing innuendo and rumor — almost always false — and then use both high government officials and members of the Washington and New York media to disseminate and publicize damaging rumors about a political rival. This gambit will work especially during the latter months of an election campaign, during a presidential transition, and in the early months of a nascent presidency when it is not fully adjusted to Washington protocol and therefore deemed especially vulnerable. The protocol will be to create three or four firewalls between the hit team and the candidate, feed the “research” to the DOJ, FBI, and CIA, and seed it in the media — in essence using foreign sources to smear a rival campaign while accusing one’s opponent of doing exactly that.

    9) FISA courts will favor status quo government narratives, especially in matters of controversial candidates and political races. We should assume that the federal courts will believe almost anything the FBI and DOJ present as evidence in their bid to obtain permission from the court to spy on political candidates and presidents. Such surveillance will become commonplace, and the court will think there is nothing particularly wrong with filing incomplete, misleading, or untrue documents in support of surveillance requests, given the general consensus that unorthodox presidential candidates and presidents must be stymied.

    10) Whistleblowers never need to be identified. They need not have any firsthand knowledge of any wrongdoing. They need not contact the relevant inspector general to first file their grievance. Rather, they will work with the opposition party in Congress to help craft complaints and forge strategies that might lead to impeachment inquiries.

    This is the new political climate. It is obvious that both George W. Bush and Barack Obama could easily have been impeached under such protocols after they lost their party’s majority in the House of Representative. From now on, their successors will likely enjoy no such exemptions.

    We are now on new anti-constitutional grounds, and the United States will probably never return to the constitutional customs and traditions of its first 233 years. The architects of this revolution were not arrayed in sunglasses and epaulets, or in business suits and wing tips, with briefcases. They were hip, cool, and progressive, and they boasted that they did all of this for us, the proverbial people, to cheers from cultural icons, media heavyweights, and those with advanced degrees.

    The United States, at least as we knew it, came to an end, not with a loud right-wing bang, but with an insidious progressive whimper.




    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    gvaldeg1 likes this.
    The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.

  2. #2
    Senior Member up2it's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    623

    Default

    Politics is a dirty job and NO ONE can win or get anything done by being clean. Party politics is even worse as no matter which one you belong to it was meant to be FOR THE PEOPLE. The Dems don't like Trump only because he is not a Politician and they can't control him. Period..

  3. #3
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    western PA
    Posts
    1,267

    Default

    The "closed door" meetings should end, the federal government needs a law like florida's "sunshine" law. No secret meetings. If it has to do with government business the people have a right to know what is going on.

    government business is the peoples business.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    NationalGunForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,692

    Default

    And where, all working day-long, was Obama-Care written to the exclusion of any Republicans until it was finished, voted into being and forced down our throats? Behind "closed doors".

    "Collusion" - you remember that word - is often conducted "Behind closed-doors".

  6. #5
    Senior Member up2it's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    623

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john9001 View Post

    government business is the peoples business.
    So why did anyone vote them into office to do what YOU wanted them to do? If not, then why not vote them out? Stupidity is what Americans get from their elected officials who they trusted but keep voting for them.

  7. #6
    Senior Member NGF Addict! Fitasc Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    7,156

    Default

    The country went to hell after the Civil War with Reconstruction and accelerated its downward spiral with Wilson and WWI, FDR and his New Deal, LBJ and his Great Society and Obama with his collusion and corruption.
    "Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience", George Carlin

    FITASC: Fédération Internationale de Tir aux Armes Sportives de Chasse.

  8. #7
    Senior Member NGF Addict! friendof2nd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    4,047

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by up2it View Post
    So why did anyone vote them into office to do what YOU wanted them to do? If not, then why not vote them out? Stupidity is what Americans get from their elected officials who they trusted but keep voting for them.
    And here lies the problem, we elected a politician because he assured us that he will vote the way we want to protect our interests, then the politician betrays the voters and votes any way he wants, even if it goes against the wishes of the voters, then What the voters do? Yes, they re-elect the same politician. So, at the end it is our fault because we keep in power those politician that betray us. I guess we are masochist and enjoy pain...............
    Wag and Stamps6 like this.
    Progressive = The new Political Correct name for a Communist

    A gun on your hip is like the insurance you pay every month that you hope never have to use.

    You can vote yourself into Socialism, but you will have to fight your way out of it! - Bearing Arms. com

  9. #8
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,692

    Default

    Until voters can directly connect the line of their pain to its source, they will not readily admit they were wrong, or even stupid, to have believed "campaign promises" from people they chose, often times over and over. If voters do not feel the pain, even as their world topples around them, they will not - or cannot - identify the source of their misery or ruin. Surely it couldn't be "their choice" that is causing this ruin? How else to explain the readily obvious "criminality, lies and theft" committed by Obama and his administration in his first term, yet the people re-elected him to continue his raids on our Treasury and to continue to receive his immoral scolds about our characters and values? Again. People are reluctant to admit they were wrong.
    friendof2nd likes this.

  10. #9
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    western PA
    Posts
    1,267

    Default

    You can't vote someone "out", there is no negative vote, you can only vote to replace them with another politician.
    Stevejet likes this.

  11. #10
    Senior Member up2it's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    623

    Default

    Yes anyone who is up to date on politics knows the term limits and you have to wait for the next election to vote them out.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •