Testimony by IG Horowitz yesterday demolishes claims he exonerated FBI of bias
Advertise with us Click for Rates
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By underdog
  • 1 Post By Stevejet

Thread: Testimony by IG Horowitz yesterday demolishes claims he exonerated FBI of bias

  1. #1
    Ancient Gaseous Emanation Popeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sacramento area, CA
    Posts
    53,256

    Default Testimony by IG Horowitz yesterday demolishes claims he exonerated FBI of bias

    Thomas Lifson
    December 19, 2019


    Important Senate testimony by I.G. Horowitz was almost totally overshadowed by the impeachment debate and vote in the House yesterday. Under questioning by Senator Josh Hawley, Horowitz clarified the very limited meaning of his previous statement that he "[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]" of political bias in the opening of Crossfire Hurricane. Tobias Hoonhout in the [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]:

    [U]nder questioning from Senator Josh Hawley (R., Mo.), Horowitz explained his investigation did leave the door open to possible political bias because his team could not accept the explanations FBI members gave on why there were [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] in their investigation.

    "We have been very careful in the connection with the FISA's for the reasons you mentioned to not reach that conclusion," Horowitz told Hawley. "As we've talked about earlier — the alteration of the email, the text messages associated with the individual who did that, and our inability to explain or understand, to get good explanations so that we could understand why this all happened."

    Horowitz's clarification comes after U.S. attorney John Durham released a statement saying his office [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] the report's statements regarding the origins of the FBI's 2016 Russia probe.

    The inspector general also said during testimony that his team was looking further into whether the FBI's "basic errors" in the case were [Only registered and activated users can see links. ].

    So there are more reports to come!

    You can watch here:






    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.

  2. #2
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    5,721

    Default

    Michael E. Horowitz was sworn in as the Inspector General of the Department of Justice (DOJ) on April 16, 2012, following his confirmation by the U.S. Senate.
    Since 2015, he has simultaneously served as the Chair of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE), an organization comprised of all 73 federal Inspectors General.
    Mr. Horowitz was previously confirmed by the Senate in 2003 to serve a six-year term as a Commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission.
    As Inspector General,
    Mr. Horowitz oversees a nationwide workforce of more than 450 special agents, auditors, inspectors, attorneys, and support staff whose mission is to detect and deter waste, fraud, abuse, and misconduct in DOJ programs and personnel, and to promote economy and efficiency in Department operations.
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

    So his job is internal. I take that as he is a part of that organization.
    Much the same as Police have internal affairs.
    This was an internal audit.
    There are supposed to be some external audits in the works I have been reading about.
    Last edited by underdog; 12-19-2019 at 04:39 PM.
    Popeye likes this.
    “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”—George Orwell

  3. #3
    AZHerper NGF Addict! gvaldeg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,274

    Default

    To me...it's still waffling!
    NRA MEMBER

  4. Remove Advertisements
    NationalGunForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    1,650

    Default

    Problem is it will never be reported that way in the MSM. The uninformed lemmings that most of us citizens are will not ever hear about it

  6. #5
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,659

    Default

    The "uninformed" will remain so. And will be happy that way. And we are supposed to be living in the age of most information.
    KILTED COWBOY likes this.

  7. #6
    Senior Member NGF Addict! friendof2nd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    4,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stevejet View Post
    The "uninformed" will remain so. And will be happy that way. And we are supposed to be living in the age of most information.
    The problem is the type of information the "snowflakes", "traveling companions", millenniums, and basement dwellers are reading, most of these people are only interested in the latest fashion, who went out with whom and which drug is more effective to get a high. They do not read anything about politics and they are content to use the trash feed to then by CNN, MSNBC, and the other extreme left cable news channels as gospel.
    Progressive = The new Political Correct name for a Communist

    A gun on your hip is like the insurance you pay every month that you hope never have to use.

    You can vote yourself into Socialism, but you will have to fight your way out of it! - Bearing Arms. com

  8. #7
    Grand Imperial Poobah NGF Addict! Mad Scientist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    18,818

    Default

    Don't confuse "uninformed" with "misinformed", some people will listen to reason when confronted with the truth.
    Hidden Content



    "The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." - George Washington, the first President of the United States (1789-1797)

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)