Academic Stupidity And Brainwashing
Advertise with us Click for Rates
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
Like Tree8Likes

Thread: Academic Stupidity And Brainwashing

  1. #1
    Ancient Gaseous Emanation Popeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sacramento area, CA
    Posts
    51,548

    Default Academic Stupidity And Brainwashing

    Walter E. Williams
    Sep 11, 2019


    Just when we thought colleges could not spout loonier ideas, we have a new one from American University. They hired a professor to teach other professors to grade students based on their "labor" rather than their writing ability. The professor that American University hired to teach that nonsense is Asao B. Inoue, who is a professor at the University of Washington in Tacoma in interdisciplinary arts and sciences. He is also the director of the university's writing center. Inoue believes that a person's writing ability should not be assessed, in order to promote "anti-racist" objectives. Inoue taught American University's faculty members that their previous practices of grading writing promoted white language supremacy. Inoue thinks that students should be graded on the effort they put into a project.

    The idea to bring such a professor to American University, where parents and students fork over $48,459 a year in tuition charges, could not have been something thought up by saner members of its academic community. Instead, it was probably the result of deep thinking by the university's diversity and campus life officials. Inoue's views are not simply extreme but possibly hostile to the academic mission of most universities. Forgiving and ignoring a students' writing ability would mostly affect black students. White students' speaking and writing would be judged against the King's English, defined as standard, pure or correct English grammar.

    Professor Noam Chomsky, called the father of modern linguistics, formulated the generative theory of language. According to his theory, the most basic form of language is a set of syntactic rules that is universal for all humans and that underlies the grammar of all human languages. We analyze and interpret our environment with words and sentences in a structured language. Oral and written language provides a set of rules that enables us to organize thoughts and construct logical meaning with our thoughts.

    Not holding students accountable to proper grammar does a disservice to those students who overall show poor writing abilities. When or if these students graduate from college, they are not going to be evaluated in their careers by Inoue's tailored standards. They will be judged according to their objective abilities, and it probably follows that if they fail to meet those objective standards, the standards themselves will be labeled as racist.

    There's another very dangerous bit of academic nonsense happening, this time at the K-12 level of education. One America News Network anchor interviewed Mary Clare Amselem, education specialist at the Heritage Foundation, about the California Department of Education's proposed ethnic studies curriculum. The proposed ethnic studies curriculum would teach children that capitalism and father figures are racist.

    The Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum also includes gross anti-Israel bias and teaches about a Palestinian-led anti-Israel initiative called Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions. The curriculum also has students study issues of police brutality and asks teachers to find incidents of bias by police in their own communities. According to an article by Shelby Talcott in The Stream, California's proposed curriculum called for students to study lawmakers such as Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar and Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib, both of whom have supported the BDS movement and have been accused of anti-Semitic rhetoric.

    The proposed ethnic studies proposal has been removed from the California Department of Education website. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said, "While I am relieved that California made the obvious decision to revisit this wholly misguided proposal, we need to know why and how a blatantly anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, factually inaccurate curriculum made its way through the ranks of California's Department of Education." He added, "This was not simply an oversight -- the California Department of Education's attempt to institutionalize anti-Semitism is not only discriminatory and intolerant, it's dangerous."

    Brainwashing our youngsters is a serious matter. The people responsible for the California Department of Education's proposal ought to be summarily fired.




    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    899

    Default

    I heard on "talk radio" yesterday that some school has a new rule that even if a student does not hand in a test paper, or gets all answers wrong, they still get a score of 50%. You might say "It's still a failing grade". But averaged-in with some 70%s, it won't be for the year. Anything to get the dunce up and out for a bad teacher.

  3. #3
    Senior Member NGF Addict! Fitasc Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    5,702

    Default

    This isn't new, they have been doing this since LBJ's Great Society movement took over all of public education.
    Levant and Mike Weber like this.
    "Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience", George Carlin

    FITASC: Fédération Internationale de Tir aux Armes Sportives de Chasse.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    NationalGunForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    AZHerper NGF Addict! gvaldeg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    2,979

    Default

    This is pathetic. Give me a break, "interdisciplinary arts and sciences" is a synthetic or invented subject or discipline that shouts "look at this oxymoron".
    NRA MEMBER

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Popeye View Post
    Walter E. Williams
    Sep 11, 2019


    Just when we thought colleges could not spout loonier ideas, we have a new one from American University. They hired a professor to teach other professors to grade students based on their "labor" rather than their writing ability. The professor that American University hired to teach that nonsense is Asao B. Inoue, who is a professor at the University of Washington in Tacoma in interdisciplinary arts and sciences. He is also the director of the university's writing center. Inoue believes that a person's writing ability should not be assessed, in order to promote "anti-racist" objectives. Inoue taught American University's faculty members that their previous practices of grading writing promoted white language supremacy. Inoue thinks that students should be graded on the effort they put into a project.

    The idea to bring such a professor to American University, where parents and students fork over $48,459 a year in tuition charges, could not have been something thought up by saner members of its academic community. Instead, it was probably the result of deep thinking by the university's diversity and campus life officials. Inoue's views are not simply extreme but possibly hostile to the academic mission of most universities. Forgiving and ignoring a students' writing ability would mostly affect black students. White students' speaking and writing would be judged against the King's English, defined as standard, pure or correct English grammar.

    Professor Noam Chomsky, called the father of modern linguistics, formulated the generative theory of language. According to his theory, the most basic form of language is a set of syntactic rules that is universal for all humans and that underlies the grammar of all human languages. We analyze and interpret our environment with words and sentences in a structured language. Oral and written language provides a set of rules that enables us to organize thoughts and construct logical meaning with our thoughts.

    Not holding students accountable to proper grammar does a disservice to those students who overall show poor writing abilities. When or if these students graduate from college, they are not going to be evaluated in their careers by Inoue's tailored standards. They will be judged according to their objective abilities, and it probably follows that if they fail to meet those objective standards, the standards themselves will be labeled as racist.

    There's another very dangerous bit of academic nonsense happening, this time at the K-12 level of education. One America News Network anchor interviewed Mary Clare Amselem, education specialist at the Heritage Foundation, about the California Department of Education's proposed ethnic studies curriculum. The proposed ethnic studies curriculum would teach children that capitalism and father figures are racist.

    The Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum also includes gross anti-Israel bias and teaches about a Palestinian-led anti-Israel initiative called Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions. The curriculum also has students study issues of police brutality and asks teachers to find incidents of bias by police in their own communities. According to an article by Shelby Talcott in The Stream, California's proposed curriculum called for students to study lawmakers such as Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar and Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib, both of whom have supported the BDS movement and have been accused of anti-Semitic rhetoric.

    The proposed ethnic studies proposal has been removed from the California Department of Education website. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said, "While I am relieved that California made the obvious decision to revisit this wholly misguided proposal, we need to know why and how a blatantly anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, factually inaccurate curriculum made its way through the ranks of California's Department of Education." He added, "This was not simply an oversight -- the California Department of Education's attempt to institutionalize anti-Semitism is not only discriminatory and intolerant, it's dangerous."

    Brainwashing our youngsters is a serious matter. The people responsible for the California Department of Education's proposal ought to be summarily fired.




    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    I would like to throw in a little context of why they are doing this. it has to do with the failed no child left behind law for public schools where emotional reasoning is pushed instead of logic. The young generation people coming from system don't think primarily in logic. they think in emotional reasoning as replacing or trumping logic and facts.

    "I feel like that gun is more dangerous than others so if we get rid of them we will be safer." This is NOT about left or right thinking. this is about lack of critical thinking. our no children left behind crowd have difficulty with critical thinking because they were taught to emotionally reason. This is not the lefts doing because it was corporate and business leaders who took control of the education system and wanted drones to fill their working ranks that did not question and ONLY follow instructions regardless of personal morals and ethics. (another cog in the machine. ) our educational leadership is not made of educators and teachers as it should be. .
    Last edited by Gimp; 09-11-2019 at 06:51 PM.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fitasc Shooter View Post
    This isn't new, they have been doing this since LBJ's Great Society movement took over all of public education.
    Actually its corporate and business leaders that took over or educational system, instead of critical thinking educators. All of these alternative learning is corporate in nature and function, that they are replacing public education with.

    being that corporate and business is the biggest employers and thus wanted work forces that worked best for their business models. They do NOT want critical thinkers because they ask why or No I won't do that for this reason, etc.

  8. #7
    Senior Member NGF Addict! Fitasc Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    5,702

    Default

    Sorry, no - the text book makers publish what the ED systems of three states want - CA, TX and NY - they RULE the business and everyone else gets the same crap as result. This is why controlling as much of these ED depts. is SO crucial to the Left
    Popeye likes this.
    "Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience", George Carlin

    FITASC: Fédération Internationale de Tir aux Armes Sportives de Chasse.

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote: Professor Noam Chomsky, called the father of modern linguistics, formulated the generative theory of language. According to his theory, the most basic form of language is a set of syntactic rules that is universal for all humans and that underlies the grammar of all human languages. We analyze and interpret our environment with words and sentences in a structured language. Oral and written language provides a set of rules that enables us to organize thoughts and construct logical meaning with our thoughts.

    NO we don't, this is NOT natural for us, we are taught this by the people around us. We actually naturally communicate through gestures and body language. I should know, due to learning disability and hearing loss. language did not come easy to me.

    If what this person claimed was fact then we would all be speaking the same language and thinking alike. We analyze communicate and learn through trial and error. we teach others what we learned eventually language came as a means to share that.

    so anyone want to stick hand in fire? How did we learn not to do that? trial and error. and gestures taught to us by parents.

    His way of thinking is we would be able to speak at birth. being language is the foundation.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fitasc Shooter View Post
    Sorry, no - the text book makers publish what the ED systems of three states want - CA, TX and NY - they RULE the business and everyone else gets the same crap as result. This is why controlling as much of these ED depts. is SO crucial to the Left
    Dude look who is sitting in the upper echelons. of the education. the states take their orders, in order to have uniform educational system for the country, its in DC etc that hands down guidelines for the states to follow. the states have to comply with the feds in order to pay for public education. Since the feds are who pay for public education. THe business and corporate leaders fill almost all of those positions not educators. THus no child left behind was brain child of corporate leaders and business leaders. BASED on who occupied those positions. THe teachers on the ground DO NOT get to decide curriculum. They get fired when they don't follow the guidlines of the feds education leadership.

    I am parroting the info by the people on the inside of this issue the teachers etc who's business it is to know who their bosses are. The people at the top are NOT educators they are business leaders and corporate leaders who either left their business or do it in parallel with their business. in order to control the direction of training where they started with what will our end product be thus the drones that fit in the cog. they wanted people who did not think for themselves and follow orders. etc. Constantly doing test teaches you to follow orders without question. And prevents you from learning the skills of critical thinking. because its about teaching you to follow instructions.

    I can not locate the list now, but I actually saw a list of education leaders that set the guidelines for the states and who they were and are. Most if not all have ZERO educator back grounds. They all have business and corporate backgrounds and either ran major businesses or still do. Their after grade 12 education had nothing to do with educating people to think critically.

    I am not sure we are even on the same page. But I do know the lower teer positions at state level and lower answer to the fed educational leadership the left CAN"T control education . they get fired for deviating from federal standards by their bosses at federal level. If they don't comply. The left can try all they want but it doesn't do them any good without controlling the top leadership at the federal level which is controlled by corporate and business leaders. .

    I been following this issue for the last 20 years or longer. especially the portion governed by the rehabilitation act of 1974. which also covered where education was going in general , who in leadership and how it impacted that law and how we are educated. who in leadership was important because if certain types of people got in that law would be torn apart. And severely impacted the education of folks like myself.
    Last edited by Gimp; 09-11-2019 at 07:42 PM.

  11. #10
    Wag
    Wag is offline
    Super Moderator Wag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    10,272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gimp View Post
    I would like to throw in a little context of why they are doing this. it has to do with the failed no child left behind law for public schools where emotional reasoning is pushed instead of logic. The young generation people coming from system don't think primarily in logic. they think in emotional reasoning as replacing or trumping logic and facts.

    "I feel like that gun is more dangerous than others so if we get rid of them we will be safer." This is NOT about left or right thinking. this is about lack of critical thinking. our no children left behind crowd have difficulty with critical thinking because they were taught to emotionally reason. This is not the lefts doing because it was corporate and business leaders who took control of the education system and wanted drones to fill their working ranks that did not question and ONLY follow instructions regardless of personal morals and ethics. (another cog in the machine. ) our educational leadership is not made of educators and teachers as it should be. .
    Quote Originally Posted by Gimp View Post
    Actually its corporate and business leaders that took over or educational system, instead of critical thinking educators. All of these alternative learning is corporate in nature and function, that they are replacing public education with.

    being that corporate and business is the biggest employers and thus wanted work forces that worked best for their business models. They do NOT want critical thinkers because they ask why or No I won't do that for this reason, etc.
    You weren't too far off on the no child left behind initiatives. But to say that corporations are responsible for the dumbing down of the education system is completely off base and reeks of conspiracy theory crap.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gimp View Post
    Quote: Professor Noam Chomsky, called the father of modern linguistics, formulated the generative theory of language. According to his theory, the most basic form of language is a set of syntactic rules that is universal for all humans and that underlies the grammar of all human languages. We analyze and interpret our environment with words and sentences in a structured language. Oral and written language provides a set of rules that enables us to organize thoughts and construct logical meaning with our thoughts.

    NO we don't, this is NOT natural for us, we are taught this by the people around us. We actually naturally communicate through gestures and body language. I should know, due to learning disability and hearing loss. language did not come easy to me.

    If what this person claimed was fact then we would all be speaking the same language and thinking alike. We analyze communicate and learn through trial and error. we teach others what we learned eventually language came as a means to share that.

    so anyone want to stick hand in fire? How did we learn not to do that? trial and error. and gestures taught to us by parents.

    His way of thinking is we would be able to speak at birth. being language is the foundation.
    Chomsky is right, though. You're incorrect. It appears that you're making an assessment way out of context based on a short, very limited insight by a linguist. Of which you and everyone else on this forum are not.

    Go read more about it and get an education about it before making such an assessment. The Stuff of Thought by Steven Pinker would be a good start, assuming you can understand his work.

    --Wag--
    "Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 2 guests)

  1. turkeycreek