Johns Hopkins Study: No Evidence ‘Assault Weapon’ Bans Reduce Mass Shootings
Advertise with us Click for Rates
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By Mad Scientist
  • 3 Post By Rivervalley0311

Thread: Johns Hopkins Study: No Evidence ‘Assault Weapon’ Bans Reduce Mass Shootings

  1. #1
    Grand Imperial Poobah NGF Addict! Mad Scientist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    19,987

    Default Johns Hopkins Study: No Evidence ‘Assault Weapon’ Bans Reduce Mass Shootings

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

    A study released by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health declares there is no evidence “assault weapon” bans lead to a lower “incidence of fatal mass shootings.”

    The push for an “assault weapons” ban is central to the Democrats’ gun control agenda nationally and is front and center for Democrats at the state level in places like [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] and [Only registered and activated users can see links. ].

    According to [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], researchers”did not find an independent association between assault weapon bans and the incidence of fatal mass shootings.”

    Researchers did claim licensing requirements like those in Connecticut help reduce the number of mass shootings, but their study omitted the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School in which 26 were killed at the school and another victim was killed in a private home.

    In other words, a study which claims licensing reduces instances of mass shootings omitted one of the most often cited mass shootings in U.S. history, even though that shooting occurred in a licensing state.

    Moreover, John Hopkins’ criteria for licensing laws allowed them to bypass Illinois which, in turn, allowed them to sidestep the never ending gun crime of Chicago.

    But the study was clear there is no evidence tying “assault weapons” to a lower incidence of mass shootings.

    Of course the anti-gun crowd will dismiss this study and continue to push for gun control. Nazi bastards.
    Win94ae likes this.
    Hidden Content



    "The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." - George Washington, the first President of the United States (1789-1797)

  2. #2
    Senior Member NGF Addict! Steyr Man 146's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,592

    Default

    Of course Paid for and funded by democrats one simply can not have a unbiased study funded by one side or the other, a Joint Study would show NO EVIDENCE but hey do not take my word for it
    Have fun and remember This Hidden Content should be the only headaches you encounter

  3. #3
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,999

    Default

    Even following video evidence of incidents whereby a good guy uses a gun to protect other individuals, students, church congregations..............none of the anti-gun individuals or organizations feels compelled to "convert" or admit their errors in judgements and abandon their anti-gun positions. They don't even care what type of gun is really at the center of "the argument of the day". They just don't want you or me having the power to make decisions about ourselves and our families lives. And it scares them, and Nancy and Chuck, that we remain adamant about possessing our firearms and the rights to do so.

    You need to remember at times, it was a crazed DEMOCRAT and supporter of Bernie who shot up the baseball field and wounded Congressman Steve Scalise, and a pair of policeman - the obligatory "good guys with guns - that shot the Mook, ass-hat Bernie admirer, and the DEM's never gave it a nod of approval. But, did the Republican house members push this incident forward to its greatest advantage. Of course not. Cowardly and comatose Republicans never fail to fail.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    NationalGunForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    "You talkin to me?" NGF Addict! Viper123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    SEUSA
    Posts
    4,057

    Default

    Johns Hopkins Study: No Evidence ‘Assault Weapon’ Bans Reduce Mass Shootings

    "A study released by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health" ...

    I understand med teams and doctors are the people that repair wounded, shot up folks but...

    you mean it takes a "medical team" to determine this? Really????
    Police records and files aren't considered or used?
    Beware the Fury of a patient man

    1st Corinthians 15:33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners


    Diversity/assimilation has no place for individualism.... For these to work... the individuals involved must work together in order to achieve a common goal




  6. #5
    Senior Member NGF Addict!
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,999

    Default

    "Studies" require funds to support the "studiers" while they study whatever needs studying. Just a form of "Someone Go Fund Me". Even the Obvious and all Known Knowledge requires re-study. Especially in areas of "gun rights", helpful/harmful foods and of course, the effects of "coffee".

  7. #6
    Senior Member NGF Addict! Rivervalley0311's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,753

    Default

    It's all about control....the left could give two sh*ts about mass shootings.

  8. #7
    Senior Member NGF Addict! friendof2nd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    4,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rivervalley0311 View Post
    It's all about control....the left could give two sh*ts about mass shootings.
    The end goal for the extreme left Socialist DemocRATS is the TOTAL control of the masses, that is the only way they can institute their crazy policies and agenda. Without a complete ban on civilian own weapons, they can not institute the type of Socialist Dictatorship they want.

    And if you vote for Sander for president, you are asking for the extreme socialist crowd to take over
    Progressive = The new Political Correct name for a Communist

    A gun on your hip is like the insurance you pay every month that you hope never have to use.

    You can vote yourself into Socialism, but you will have to fight your way out of it! - Bearing Arms. com

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Search tags for this page

    bloomberg school of public health: no evidence ?assault weapon? bans reduce mass shootings

    ,

    johns hopkins research on assault weapons ban

    Click on a term to search for related topics.