Advertise with us Click for Rates
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Ruger vs. Smith & Wesson

  1. #1
    Junior Member Inkoosikas is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    North Pole Alaska
    Posts
    2

    Default Ruger vs. Smith & Wesson

    Hello everyone,

    I am trying to decide between a Ruger and a Smith & Wesson 44 magnum. I just moved up to Alaska and want to pick up a 44. My question is which should I get? A Ruger or a Smith & Wesson, and why? I don't want to sound rude, however I do have a few requests for people answering my question. First I am looking for a factual Answer, not something opinionated such as "I have a Ruger and it is really great", I am looking for the reasons that one would be better then the other. And second, who ever answers, I would really appreciate it if you would include in your answers any credentials you have which would qualify you to answer my question accurately.
    Thank you in advance for your help!

  2. #2
    Ancient Gaseous Emanation Popeye is a member to emulate Popeye is a member to emulate Popeye is a member to emulate Popeye is a member to emulate Popeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sacramento area, CA
    Posts
    22,904

    Default

    I'm 66 years old. I bought my first rifle at Sears & Roebuck when I was 6 years old. I am a semi-retired gunsmith. I successfully hunt feral hogs, black bear and white tailed deer with .41 Mag, .44 Mag and ,45 Colt revolvers.

    S&W revolvers are smoother than Ruger revolvers. S&W revolvers are more fragile than Ruger revolvers. Although beauty is in the eye of the beholder, S&W revolvers are prettier than Ruger revolvers.

    Ruger revolvers are available in single action as well as double action. Personally, I have no real use for a large bore DA revolver (even though I do own some). Ruger revolvers are massively strong, much stronger than S&W revolvers. The loads I use for feral hogs will quickly destroy a S&W N frame revolver. Ruger Single action big bore revolvers are relatively light (this makes a big difference at the end of the day).

    I use Ruger Blackhawk and Super Blackhawk revolvers for hunting.

    Now, go and ask the 'old guys' where you live in Alaska which revolver they prefer. I'll bet they tell you to get a short barreled shotgun or a .30-30/.35 lever action rifle for 'bear protection'.
    The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.

  3. #3
    Junior Member Inkoosikas is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    North Pole Alaska
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Thank you Popeye, that is exactly the information that I was looking for. I had read in different places online that the Rugers were stronger, however I was not sure if it was opinion or fact.

  4. #4
    The 500 S&W stare... bigweatherby has a spectacular aura about bigweatherby has a spectacular aura about bigweatherby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South-West Michigan
    Posts
    10,247

    Default

    I have been hunting with handguns for about 15 years. I have taken game with both brands. I like both and have never had any problems with either of them. I think the Smith and Wesson will be nicer out of the box but I have had trigger jobs and some other light custom work done on my Rugers and they shoot great and work awesome. Ruger single actions are fantastic. In a place where it might be tough to get the gun repaired, I would go with a Ruger Super Blackhawk. If you plan on shooting factory 240 grain loads and not worrying about anything else, the Smith and Wesson would hold up well and be a very accurate companion too.
    Popeye likes this.
    If I had a dollar for every brain Obama DIDN'T have, I would have one dollar.

    Happiness is campfire light reflecting off your sons smiling face.

    Just because I am paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.

    You don't truly begin to live your life until you begin to share it with your child.

    "12 gauge autoloader"
    "45 longslide with laser sighting"
    "Phase plasma rifle with a 40 watt range."
    "Hey. Just what ya see buddy!"

  5. #5
    jp1
    jp1 is offline
    Banned jp1 may want to re-evaluate his standing
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Good post and good answers, thanks.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Gun Geezer will become famous soon enough Gun Geezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    central florida
    Posts
    469

    Default

    I bought my Ruger Redhawk .44 mag revolver in the '70s. It still looks and shoots like the day I bought it. I have no real use for it as At 70 yrs. of age, I am planning no bear hunting in west Yellowstone. But it's just to pretty to part with. I'll agree that Smiths have a timeless classic look, but Rugers are stylishly pretty and if you'll excuse the pun, more bang for the buck!
    If voting could change anything for the better, It'd already be illegal.

  7. #7
    Instigator Luvs2Play is a jewel Luvs2Play is a jewel Luvs2Play is a jewel Luvs2Play's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Nebraska flatlands
    Posts
    9,377

    Default

    I guess I'm not qualified to answer your questions. I own both, I shoot both, and I will not pick one over the other. So don't worry about being rude and not allowing a forum to work as it should.

    As far as credentials, I am a gun owner on a gun forum.
    "Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian."

  8. #8
    Senior Member seg-saege will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    614

    Default

    I own a Blackhawk .45 Colt and a Super Blackhawk .44 Rem Mag. I have shot many S & W during my years with DOC. If you check the reloading manuels you'll find a load just for Ruger Blackhawks and Supers as well as Freedom Arms. A more powerful load may suit your needs. I'd take the Ruger. Shoot both and see what you think.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Steyr Man 146 is on a distinguished road Steyr Man 146's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    917

    Default

    I don`t own any 44s but I do own a host of calibers from both manufactures... Both are fine manufactures you can`t go wrong with any of the two you listed. In the circles I travel most would choose the Ruger some feel it is stronger...I would be happy with either one....And no I`m not offended you asked for a direct answer and I hope you received it in this forum.. Its a cool to be able to ask those Questions..When I started collecting years ago I was shooting blind.. Did not know forums like this existed so good luck hope we were helpful...

  10. #10
    Senior Member NGF Addict! coach1299 will become famous soon enough coach1299 will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,631

    Default

    I own and like both. As far as the strength of the gun, it's a non issue to me because I don't have a revolver bigger than my S&W Model 686 357 mag, and it's as solid as a rock. I don't hand load, and so my L frame, various K frames, and the one J frame, have all handled many factory loads (some hot ones) without any problems. I'm partial to the Smith because I owned and learned on older model 10's, 15's, and 19's, and I just fell in love with them. My 686 was a late 80's gun, and that also has been a 10 in my book. Ruger makes a great gun, and I don't doubt that they are a little stronger, but I have no problems with either. Never had to send back either of my Rugers so I can't comment on their customer service, but I would expect them to be top of the line based on what others have told me. Out of the 8 S&W handguns that I own, owned, or that were issued to me (going back to 1980), I've had 5 occasions requiring service. Each time I was 100% satisfied with the way Smith handled the problem, and I tend to be picky about service. Service is a big issue to me. Can't go wrong with either one IMO. Like a Chevy or a Ford, or a Lincoln or a Caddy. Take your pick! Credentials are listed in my profile if you're interested. Good luck! Oh yeah, one last thought; When I was on NYPD in the early 80's, we were authorized to carry Smith, Rugers, and Colts. Most of the officers went with Smith because it was popular, but I do recall the armorers (who knew more about the quality of the guns) sware by the Rugers as being top of the line. They never said anything bad about the Smith's, but if it was up to them they recommended the Rugers. Colt was a dying breed at that time and I have no substantial experience with them, but they sure had the prettiest finish and the smoothest actions from what I remember.

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Search tags for this page

ruger or smith and wesson
,

ruger vs smith and wesson

,
ruger vs smith and wesson revolver
,

ruger vs smith and wesson revolvers

,
smith and wesson or ruger
,

smith and wesson vs ruger

,
smith and wesson vs ruger revolver

Tags for this Thread